Challenge in formatting and Response

For the readability and consumability of the content, it should share actionable tips to ensure readers are never empty handed.

For the reusability, it should separate the action and interpretation into different article and sections and the case study (field trip type article) should only share facts and observations. And this potentially increases the barrier for our readership to identify valuable information.

We need to reconsider the balance and structure for articles of the magazine.

How to ensure reusability minimal impact on consumability, or otherwise how to redefine target readers? Project coordinators of the grassroots may not be able to digest raw observation and sophisticated language. Main while, project based researches may not be able to support operational cost of the magazine.

The original approach was too reader unfriendly, but now the articles while they are more digestible they cannot be reused – like a cooked chicken cannot be used to make Drunken chicken.

Now it seems to be a dilemma.